Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP) is the underlying concept upon which all internationally recognised food safety management programmes are built. For food processors and manufacturers, understanding HACCP is critical to implementing systems and procedures that minimise risk, keep the public safe and uphold a company’s reputation.
This article from the food safety and physical contaminant detection experts at Sesotec explains what HACCP is, why the concept is so important in the food industry and what implementing an HACCP programme entails.
What
is HACCP?
HACCP
stands for Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points
and refers to an internationally recognised methodology for reducing food
safety risks in facilities that manufacture, process, or handle food products.
HACCP involves identifying and assessing potential sources of food safety
hazards in order to establish a procedure for proactively controlling for and
reducing risk.
HACCP standards emphasise controlling for
preventable and eliminable food safety risks by means of two key components:
Hazard
analysis refers
to identifying and analysing the food safety risks present in a food handling plant’s
processes. In particular, hazard analysis centres on evaluating potential
sources for microbiological, chemical and physical contamination.
Critical
control points
refer to key junctures in a food handling process at which controls can be
applied to prevent or eliminate food safety hazards, or to reduce risk to an
acceptable level. (Read more about determining critical
control points)
Why
is HACCP important in the food industry?
As
a proactive process control system, HACCP is crucial for identifying and
preventing hazards in food production so as to better protect public health.
Rather than simply controlling for major food risks after food products have
been processed and packaged, an HACCP plan involves strictly monitoring each
step of the food production process in order to prevent contamination hazards from
occurring in the first place.
When is the implementation of an HACCP plan
required?
Because
of its effectiveness in preventing contamination hazards, the HACCP methodology
is the basis for all internationally recognised food safety guidelines and
many food safety laws. Obtaining food safety certification from any programme
accredited by the Global Food Safety Initiative will invariably involve
implementing and documenting an effective HACCP plan.
A
few examples of international food safety certification programmes requiring
the implementation of an HACCP plan are:
BRCGS (Brand Reputation Compliance Global
Standards, formerly BRC)
FSSC 22000 (Food Safety System Certification
based on ISO 22000)
There
are two phases of planning involved in the development of an HACCP plan. The
preliminary phase of creating an HACCP plan involves understanding the specific
conditions, products and processes in the facility. The second phase involves
applying the HACCP framework in order to write an actionable plan that is
customised to the needs of the facility.
Five preliminary
steps in developing an HACCP plan
Before
a food handling company can begin to write an HACCP plan, there are five
preliminary steps to follow. Each of these preliminary HACCP planning steps
will help the company obtain a comprehensive picture of risk and responsibility
within the food handling facility.
Assemble a dedicated HACCP team – Companies start by designating a
team of individuals to be responsible for developing the HACCP plan. This team
may consist entirely of employees or may also involve assistance in the form of
consulting from outside food safety experts. The resources allocated to the
HACCP team should also be decided during this preliminary stage.
Describe the products and the
processes – During
this step, the HACCP team composes detailed descriptions of each food product
made and process carried out in the plant. These descriptions should also
include information such as where and how the product is to be used, how it is
packaged and labelled, as well as shelf-life and temperature considerations.
Develop a complete list of
ingredients and raw materials – Listing and categorising all the ingredients and raw materials used
in a food product or process can help companies zero in on risk areas. The list
should include all ingredients, both primary and additive, as well as all raw
materials, such as packaging or casing, that are processed in their facility.
Develop a process flow diagram – Starting at raw goods receiving
and finishing with outgoing shipments, every single processing step carried out
within the plant should be depicted in a process flow diagram. This diagram
serves as an accurate representation of how products are made in the plant and
should be verified via a walkthrough of the facility.
Ensure compliance with sanitation requirements – Adherence to proper hygiene requirements makes
for a strong foundation for an HACCP plan. As a prerequisite, all legal
regulations regarding sanitation must be upheld before an HACCP plan can be
drafted.
Once
the preliminary planning phase has been completed, the HACCP team can begin to
draft a plan.
The seven steps of an
HACCP plan
There
are seven key principles that comprise the HACCP framework, each of which must
feature in the written HACCP plan.
Conduct
a hazard analysis –
Hazard analysis is a procedure in which all processes carried out in a food
handling facility are examined for their potential to introduce contamination hazards. Hazard analyses take place in two steps. First, all
potential hazards are identified. Second, these hazards are evaluated to assess
the level of food safety risk they pose. For example, a company may identify two
potential sources of metallic contaminants in their products: 1) raw materials
arrive at the facility already harbouring metal particles and 2) machine wear
and tear during processing. The company may then determine there is a higher
level of risk in the former process and a lower level of risk in the latter.
Identify
the critical control points –
A critical control point (CCP) is an intermediary step or procedure at which a
control is necessary to prevent, eliminate, or reduce the risk of a food safety
hazard to an acceptable level. Typically, a decision tree is used to identify CCPs. Generally speaking, the more processing steps
carried out in a particular food handling facility, the more CCPs will be
necessary to adequately control for contamination hazards.
For example, a company may determine that raw
material intake is a CCP, requiring that all incoming goods are scanned for metallic
contaminants before they are processed. The company may also determine post-packaging
and pre-shipment as another CCP in order to catch any metallic contaminants
that entered the product during processing.
Establish
critical limits – A critical limit is the maximum acceptable level of a
particular food safety parameter which indicates an unacceptably high risk to
food safety if surpassed. Critical limits are typically expressed as values
like time, temperature, pH, water activity, electrical conductivity, etc.
Establish monitoring procedures for
critical limits at CCPs –
Procedures will be established for the consistent monitoring of critical
limits at every CCP. These procedures will describe when and how frequently the
measurements will be taken, who is responsible for performing or
monitoring them and what kind of methods or devices will be used. For example, this
stage may involve creating a procedure for monitoring an end-of-line metal
detector that inspects packaged products. The sensitivity of the metal detector
should be determined here, as well as the parties responsible for monitoring
the performance of the device at specific intervals.
Establish
corrective actions – Corrective actions refer to the established
procedures which must be followed should any parameter at a critical control
point deviate from the determined critical limits. First and foremost, the
corrective actions should prevent the potentially hazardous food from entering
the food chain. But secondarily, the corrective actions
should also serve to rectify the cause of the hazard, thus preventing the
situation from reoccurring.For
example, this stage may stipulate that all units rejected by the metal detector
are immediately removed from the production line and undergo a separate, closer
inspection procedure in an effort to trace the contaminants back to the source
of the hazard.
Verification –
The efficacy of the HACCP plan should be tested and verified through measures
such as process audits, final product inspections and random sample testing. For
instance, the verification step of an HACCP plan may involve regularly calibrating contaminant detection
equipment for accuracy in order to ensure
foreign bodies are being detected and rejected reliably.
Recordkeeping –
All of the steps outlined above should be documented in detail and archived on
an ongoing basis in order to prove that all food products were produced safely.
For
instance, sophisticated contaminant detection equipment includes software that automatically generates
and archives reports about each inspected batch. These reports can then be
downloaded on a regular basis and stored centrally with all other food safety
records.
Conclusions
HACCP
is the foundation of all modern food safety management programmes. As a systematic approach to preventing contamination
hazards, HACCP shifts the focus of food safety from reactive control measures
to proactive ones. The ultimate objective of any HACCP plan is to make food
products as safe as possible by ensuring that the entire food handling process
was carried out as safely as possible. By creating an HACCP plan, food industry
companies are able to identify the procedures and technologies they need to
guarantee the safety of their products.
About Sesotec
As the global demand for food
rises, so do the responsibilities of the food industry. Safe and
efficient food production practices are crucial to the health of both
humanity and the planet. Our intelligent technologies
and services help food industry companies profitably manufacture safe
products and reduce food waste. Compliant. Sustainable. Efficient.